|
![]() |
EMPLOYEE INVOLVEMENT AND EMPOWERMENT When employees become an integral part of the safety process, meaningful and lasting changes occur. Employees develop a sense of responsibility and pride in the success of the overall program, increasing safety and health awareness which affects not only themselves, but coworkers and workplace visitors as well. While it is ultimately management's responsibility to ensure worker safety and health, employee involvement is the key to making it work. Line employees have the most to contribute to their own safety by their direct involvement in OSH protection efforts. Line personnel are in immediate contact with hazardous chemicals and hazardous situations. This worksite hands-on knowledge enables them to participate in hazard identification and problem-solving efforts. This employee involvement is a cornerstone guiding principle of our Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS) philosophy.
An effective safety and health program cannot succeed without
the active participation of all organizational elements. DOE
encourages employee involvement in developing the structure
and participating in the operation of safety and health programs. Direct communication means follow:
Means of indirect communication may include safety suggestion
boxes or an electronic mail (e-mail) system. Employee involvement takes many forms, such as participation in:
EMPLOYEE RIGHTS All DOE Federal employees are responsible for maintaining safe and healthful working conditions. Outlined below are employees' rights and responsibilities. The DOE FEOSH Poster must be posted in all Federal workspaces in an area where employees might congregate, such as a lunch room area. View the DOE FEOSH poster at the URL: http://www.hss.energy.gov/sesa/corporatesafety/feosh/pubs/FEOSH-2-22-r.pdf Workers have the right to:
RESPONSIBILITIES Along with rights come certain responsibilities. To ensure that workers participate in and are protected by FEOSH activities, managers, supervisors, FEOSH POCs, employee representatives, and the workers themselves are responsible for FEOSH program aspects. FEOSH Program Coordinator/Manager
Managers/Supervisors
Employees
HAZARD REPORTING SYSTEMS Employees play a key role in discovering and controlling hazards that may occur or already exist in the workplace. Daily contact and hands-on responsibility give them a unique perspective on work procedures and conditions. A reliable system for employees to report hazardous work conditions should be established to increase the effectiveness of the organization's safety and health program. Several acceptable employee hazard reporting systems are
currently used by DOE and the private sector. More common
systems include oral reports to supervisors and union representatives,
suggestion programs, maintenance work orders, and written
forms providing anonymity. Many sites use a combination of
some or all of these systems. At all worksites, employee oral reports to supervisors, union representatives, and safety and health POCs are encouraged. If the supervisor is properly trained and understands the scope of his/her responsibility for the workers' safety and health, informal oral reports are a natural occurrence. For valid concerns, the supervisor has the additional responsibility of correcting the hazard, requesting correction by maintenance, or requesting facility management assistance. Facility managers may, in turn, request help from the FEOSH Program Manager/Coordinator. Most work sites encourage this type of reporting. Used alone,
however, it does not provide comprehensive, long-term hazard
correction tracking and trending. Suggestion Programs The most frequently used written system is a suggestion program where employees are encouraged to make safety and health suggestions. This approach encourages employees to use their imagination when suggesting safer or more healthful work practices as well as reporting unsafe conditions and acts. If these programs are being used to report safety and health hazards, management must ensure that collection points are checked several times a day and suggestions are read at the time of collection to ensure that hazards are corrected in a timely manner. If the suggestion program is used as the sole means of reporting
hazards or reporting them in writing, management must ensure
that employees understand how to use the system for all types
of safety and health reporting, not just presenting ideas. Many medium or large worksites develop or buy an employee
hazards-reporting system such as "STOP," developed
by DuPont. Typical STOP programs include a format for training
employees in basic hazard recognition. Employees write unsafe
conditions and practices on cards, which are usually forwarded
to their supervisor or manager for action and the safety department
for checking and tracking valid hazard corrections. For unsafe conditions, maintenance personnel normally will have to be called to make the proper correction. Contact your appropriate maintenance dispatcher for specific instructions and procedures; coordinate with your supervisor. Note: This system should be used by employees reporting hazards only if there is a special high-priority code for maintenance safety and health work orders. In doing so, the maintenance supervisor is required to give them a higher priority than production improvement maintenance. Copies should be immediately carried to the safety department (or site safety and health professional) so that corrections can be tracked. None of these hazard reporting systems, by themselves, are expected to stand alone in ensuring that hazards are corrected. For example, the maintenance work order system may do an excellent job of correcting hazardous physical conditions. Hazardous work practices, however, may need to be addressed via another reporting mechanism. Employees should be encouraged to use whatever reporting
mechanism (or combination) makes the most sense and allows
for imaginative approaches in improving working conditions,
work practices, procedures, etc. While some of the systems described above include writing on forms, the best written system for your worksite may be one that you devise for employee hazard reporting. Anonymity, when desired, may be arranged by asking the reporting employee to not sign his/her name or give the filled-out form directly to the supervisor. Responses to anonymous reports may be provided by posting a typed response on a bulletin board in the area mentioned in the report. Written safety and health issues should be reported to the supervisor and FEOSH Manager/Coordinator on DOE HQ F 3790.7, Policy for Reporting Unsafe/Unhealthful Work Conditions Remember that, in all of these aspects discussed above, some variations will work better for your site than others. Make sure your policy
Use the hazard information to revise your hazard inventory
and/or improve your hazard prevention program. If an employee believes that he or she is experiencing a safety and health reprisal, the allegations should be handled through the Office of the Inspector General (IG), Employee Concerns Program, or the current DOE collective bargaining unit agreement, as outlined on the DOE FEOSH Poster with technical assistance from the appropriate safety office or the DOE FEOSH Program Office. At each site, the New Employee Orientation should inform employees of appropriate procedures to follow when voicing concerns and protecting themselves against reprisal. Any employee or bargaining unit representative who believes that an act of reprisal or discrimination has been committed may file a complaint under grievance procedures, or the appropriate Article contained in the DOE/employee representative Collective Bargaining Agreement. Additionally, if an employee feels uncomfortable in reporting a concern to the supervisor or safety professional, concerns may be reported with anonymity to the DOE local or DOE Headquarters Employee Concerns Program. The Department of Energy Employee Concerns Program may be found at: http://www.civilrights.energy.gov/employee_concerns.asp Any act of reprisal however slight or subtle against any employee who has reported a safety and health concern is a "prohibited personnel practice." A list of proper "personnel actions" is contained in Title 5 U.S.C., 2302 (a)(2)(A). "Prohibited personnel actions" are listed in Title 5 U.S.C., 2302 (b). Any personnel action would become "prohibited" if issued or authorized as reprisal or punishment for whistleblowing or exercising a protected right. Such actions would include significant changes in employee duties, responsibilities, or working conditions when unrelated to merit or position requirements. Any employee who believes that a reprisal or discrimination act has been committed may file a complaint under grievance procedures, or the appropriate Article contained in the DOE/employee representative Collective Bargaining Agreement. An employee representative grievance must be filed within 15 workdays of becoming aware of the act or occurrence. When such grievances are carried through an arbitration hearing,
an arbitrator can order a stay of any "prohibited personnel
practice" (reprisal) and include discipline to the supervisor
involved (P.L. 103-424, October 29, 1994). DOE Order 3750.6
provides guidance on discipline for violations of Title 5
U.S.C., 2302. View the DOE FEOSH Program information brochure General information on employee safety and health concerns
may be found at: TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE For assistance with your program contact: David M. Smith, Manager
This page was last updated on October 24, 2011
![]() |
||||||||||||||