| NFS Safety Notices Issue No. 96-03 June 1996 | ||
Compressed Gas Cylinder SafetyContents
IntroductionThis notice is one in a series of publications issued by the Office of Nuclear and Facility Safety to share nuclear safety information throughout the Department of Energy complex. For more information, contact Richard L. Trevillian, Office of Operating Experience Analysis and Feedback, Office of Nuclear and Facility Safety, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC 20585, telephone (301) 903-3074. This Safety Notice should be processed as an external source of lessons- learned information as described in DOE-STD-7501-95, Development of DOE Lessons-Learned Programs. Safety Notices are distributed to U.S. Department of Energy Program Offices, Field Offices, and contractors who have responsibility for the operation and maintenance of nuclear and related facilities, and to other organizations involved in nuclear safety. Written requests to be added to or deleted from the distribution of Safety Notices should be sent to: Christine Crow, RPI, 20251 Century Blvd., Germantown, MD 20874 or by fax, (301) 540-2499. The ESH Office of Information Management maintains a file of Safety Notices and supporting information. Copies can be obtained by contacting the Office of Information Management at (301) 903-0449 or by writing to the Office of Information Management, U.S. Department of Energy, EH-72/Suite 100, CXXI/3, Washington, DC 20585. Notice SummaryThis Notice describes events at Department of Energy (DOE) facilities involving compressed gas cylinders. These events resulted in injuries to employees, damage to equipment, and adversely affected facility operations. The causes and significance of the events are described along with corrective actions and lessons learned. ApplicabilityThis Notice applies to DOE facilities that use, store, or transport cylinders containing compressed gases. The Notice should be processed as an external source of lessons-learned information as described in DOE-STD-7501-95.(1) The Office of Nuclear and Facility Safety encourages DOE managers to examine their cylinder safety procedures, emergency plans, and safety analyses in light of this information. DefinitionsCompressed Gas Material or mixture that is in a cylinder with a pressure exceeding 40 psia at 70 degrees Fahrenheit; or, regardless of pressure at 70 degrees Fahrenheit, with an absolute pressure exceeding 104 psi at 130 degrees Fahrenheit; or flammable liquid with a vapor pressure exceeding 40 psia at 100 degrees Fahrenheit as determined by American Society for Testing and Materials Test D-323-94.(2) Compressed Gas Association Association formed in 1913 and dedicated to developing and promoting safety standards and safe practices in the industrial gas industry; composed of more than 200 companies. Compressed Gas Cylinder Container with a maximum water capacity of 1,000 pounds that meets the shape, size, and material of construction and design standards of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers and the Department of Transportation. Corrosive Gas Gas that deteriorates living tissue or cylinder system components by chemical action. Flammable Gas Gas that when mixed with air in a concentration of 13 percent or less by volume forms a flammable mixture; or has a flammable range with air wider than 12 percent regardless of the lower limit. Toxic Gas Compressed gas that has a median lethal concentration in air of more than 200 and less than 2,000 parts per million by volume of gas; or vapor that is lethal when continuously inhaled for an hour by albino rats weighing between 200 and 300 grams. Highly Toxic Gas Compressed gas with a median lethal concentration in air of 200 parts per million or less by volume of gas; or vapor that is lethal when continuously inhaled for an hour by albino rats weighing between 200 and 300 grams. Pressure Regulator Mechanical device that is used to control discharge pressure of compressed gas from a cylinder. Pressure Relief Device Pressure- or temperature-activated device that prevents pressure from rising above a predetermined maximum to preclude rupture of a normally charged cylinder. Valve Protection Cap Device that is attached to the neck ring or body of a cylinder to protect the cylinder valve from damage if the cylinder falls or is struck. Events SummaryOperating Experience Analysis and Feedback engineers reviewed the Occurrence Reporting and Processing System (ORPS) data base and found 203 reports related to compressed gas cylinders. Most of these events can be classified in the following categories. High-Energy HazardsOn September 20, 1995, at the Oak Ridge Y-12 site, a 100-pound-capacity cylinder containing carbon dioxide discharged its contents and became airborne after two fire department workers incorrectly manipulated a discharge-valve, hand-lever attachment. The cylinder narrowly missed the workers as it was propelled out of the storage enclosure. The cylinder hit a paved parking area and traveled an additional 30 feet before striking an inclined concrete ramp.(3) The workers were examining the cylinder assembly in preparation for dismantling a fire suppression system. Investigators determined that the event was caused by inadequate planning for the removal of an obsolete fire suppression system, the workers' general lack of knowledge regarding the design of the cylinder discharge valve, and the worker's failure to notice that the cylinder was inadequately restrained. Corrective actions included the following.
On May 7, 1993, at Los Alamos National Laboratory, office employees smelled gas coming from a propane storage area. Two employees went to investigate and heard an intermittent hissing noise coming from one of eight 100-pound propane storage cylinders. They tried to remove the valve protection cap to determine if the shut-off valve was fully closed. In the process, the valve protection cap vented, and a stream of liquefied petroleum gas sprayed from the two openings on the valve protection cap and struck both employees on their forearms. They were treated for minor, first-degree cold burns and released. Following the incident, the Los Alamos Hazardous Materials Team took the cylinder to an isolated area and vented the excess pressure.(4) Investigators determined that the propane tank had been overfilled by an off-site vendor, and, when the cylinder was exposed to the sun, the propane was released through the relief valve. The cylinders were not stored in accordance with the administrative procedure that required hazardous gas to be in a dry, cool, well-ventilated area and protected from direct sunlight. Corrective actions included the following.
Breathing-Air HazardsOn May 2, 1994, at the Hanford T-Plant, four employees were exposed to unknown fumes from breathing air supplied by a contaminated cylinder as they repackaged drums of soil. The contaminated cylinder of compressed air was a replacement from a supply station for an exhausted cylinder of breathing air. As the employees began to breath air from the replacement cylinder, they became light-headed and nauseated.(5) Investigators cut the cylinder open and found a residue coating along with areas of rust. The odor was offensive. Corrective actions included replacing breathing-air cylinders older than 20 years and implementing a sniff test of breathing-air cylinders for offensive odors before use. Hazardous and Corrosive GasesOn March 13, 1996, four employees at the Ames Laboratory were exposed to hydrogen sulfide fumes when a regulator connected to a cylinder assembly leaked. A researcher, attempting to transfer the gas to a flow rate column, opened the valve to the cylinder when the regulator relief device leaked. He tried to close the valve with a wrench, then placed the cylinder inside a walk-in hood. After closing the hood sash, the researcher lost consciousness and slumped to the floor. A second researcher pulled him out of the area. Two others were exposed to the fumes while providing assistance.(6) Investigators postulated that a spring in the regulator relief device was damaged by stress-induced corrosion from pressure on the spring and the corrosive properties of hydrogen sulfide gas. On April 15, 1994, 40 people were exposed to chlorine gas at the Argonne National LaboratoryWest when a Plant Services custodian attempted to remove a cylinder from service. Because he was not properly trained on cylinder operations, he did not close the cylinder valve before disconnecting the yoke and regulator. As he started to remove the screw securing the yoke to the cylinder, the seal broke, releasing chlorine gas. The cylinder leaked until a member of the Hazardous Material Team closed the cylinder valve approximately 41 minutes later. The custodian and 39 others were exposed to the gas, and 900 people were evacuated from the area. Investigators determined that about 20 pounds of chlorine were released to the atmosphere.(7),(8),(9) A Type A Accident Investigation Board found that the custodian had no specific training for disconnecting the cylinder. Also, there was no written, approved procedure. The Board also determined there was neither a system safety analysis nor a specific task safety analysis for the operation. Corrective actions for this event included training Plant Services personnel on operating and maintenance procedures and on hazards associated with chlorine. Also, an administrative limit of 170 pounds was established to limit the maximum quantity of chlorine on site. Radiological ContaminationOn April 8, 1993, at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, two technicians in the Plutonium Process and Handling facility were working on a storage drum when one technician accidentally dropped an oil can on an assembly connecting two tritium/argon gas cylinders. The can struck a fitting, loosening it and allowing gas to escape. Technicians tightened the fitting approximately one minute later. The technicians were internally exposed, and tritium was released to the environment.(10),(11) Corrective actions for this event included counseling the careless technician on attention to detail when working with radioactive materials or contaminated equipment. Guidelines on working with tritium operations were updated, and emergency procedures for evacuation of personnel were added. Significance of EventsBecause gas cylinders are so commonly used, workers tend to overlook the hazards. The Computerized Accident Information Reporting System (CAIRS) data base lists 155 cylinder accidents with a cost to DOE in excess of $2.5 million. A review of the accidents indicates a downward trend in cost and number of accidents since 1990 (figure 1).
Following is a list of some of the more common hazards of using compressed gas cylinders.
Lessons Learned and RecommendationsMost cylinder events are avoidable. Only 16 percent of the cylinder-related events listed in ORPS involved equipment or material problems, and almost half occurred during normal operations or activities. Approximately 13 percent involved cylinders that were contaminated or caused contamination. Figure 2 shows a breakdown by nature of occurrences.
The most frequent root cause of these events was attributed to management issues (36 percent). Figure 3 shows a breakdown of root causes.
The following measures are recommended to prevent cylinder events. Cylinder Descriptions and Labels
Cylinder Storage
Cylinder Use
Special Gases
Final EvaluationA review of the CAIRS database indicates that gas cylinder accidents have cost DOE over $2.5 million since 1984. This figure does not include costs associated with program corrective actions, such as training, procedure enhancements, and hazards analysis. Hazards associated with compressed gas cylinders at DOE facilities are similar to those encountered in industrial plants. However, because many DOE facilities contain nuclear material, there is an extra concern that the cylinders do not become a secondary nuclear hazard. Compressed gas cylinder safety should be an integral part of a facility safety program. Elements of cylinder safety should be included in the safety manual. Employees using, manipulating, or transporting cylinders should be trained in cylinder safety and operation. Potential industrial, process, or operational hazards associated with compressed gas cylinders should be analyzed to define the risks posed to personnel and the environment. This should include identification and implementation through emergency plans and normal operational procedures. Regulations and GuidelinesThe following documents apply to compressed gas cylinders used at DOE facilities. · Department of Energy DOE O 440.1(13) requires a written worker-protection program that provides a place of employment free of recognized hazards and cites Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations. Attachment 1, section 6, provides requirements for a pressure-safety program. · DOE 5480.23(14) establishes the requirements for contractors responsible for design, construction, operation decontamination, or decommissioning of nuclear facilities to develop safety analyses that establish and evaluate the adequacy of the safety bases of the facilities. · Department of Transportation Interstate transportation of compressed gas cylinders is regulated by 49 CFR 100 to 179.(15) These regulations refer to Compressed Gas Association CGA P-1-1991 for transportation of compressed gas cylinders. · Occupational Safety and Health Administration Employee safety is governed by the Department of Labor. Marking, storage, labeling, and handling are governed by OSHA regulations as stated in 29 CFR 1910.(16) The requirements of 29 CFR 1910.101,(17) state that in-plant handling, storage, and use of compressed gases in cylinders shall comply with Compressed Gas Association CGA P-1-1991.(18) Additional InformationAdditional information on compressed gas cylinder safety can be found in the Handbook of Compressed Gases(19) and the Guide to Safe Handling of Compressed Gases.(20) References
Notices Previously Issued
| |||||||||||||
| | Home |
Performance Measures |
Lessons Learned |
| ES&H TIS | | ||
| http://tis-hq.eh.doe.gov/web/oeaf/lessons_learned/ons/sn9402.html | |
| Last modified: Wednesday, 15-Jan-97 14:01:00 |