[DOE LETTERHEAD]
National
Nuclear Security Administration
Pantex Site
Office
January 10, 2005
The Honorable John T. Conway,
Chairman
625 Indiana Ave., N.W.
Suite 700
Washington, D.C. 20004-2901
The special tooling program at
Pantex has not demonstrated the level of rigor the National Nuclear Security
Administration (NNSA) expects from a program directly supporting nuclear
explosive operations. The NNSA
Headquarters (HQ) lead assessment along with previous reviews including those
performed by members of your staff and mine indicate lingering, unresolved
issues. Although no operational safety
impacts or near misses have resulted due to these program deficiencies, Pantex
Plant is taking significant actions (both compensatory and longer
term) that should bring the special tooling program to a level of rigor
commensurate to its importance in supporting nuclear explosive operations. NNSA Pantex Site Office (PXSO) and NNSA HQ
have been and continue to be involved in these actions.
In response to concerns expressed
in your December 15, 2004, letter to Ambassador Brooks, I have attached a BWXT
prepared tooling program report and the BWXT tooling improvement plan. As you know, several of the BWXT self-imposed
compensatory measures address the recent discovery that special tooling
fasteners may not have been torqued to design
specifications. Not only are fasteners
in the tooling load-path being checked, but a complete review of all tools that
have features that perform a safety function credited within the authorization
basis is also being performed. While
these short-term actions are prudent and necessary to support resumption of all
weapon operations, more comprehensive actions are also being taken to enhance
the overall program with the goal of satisfying all of the criteria in the
suspended NNSA special tooling review. Upon BWXT declaration of readiness, the NNSA
intends on re-performing the special tooling program assessment under the same
team leadership, utilizing the same criteria.
In the next couple weeks I will
also conduct a management review to convince myself that actions taken, as well
as those planned to improve the program are reasonable and sufficient. This review will involve several members of my
senior staff as well as, HQ members of the special tooling assessment team. I would like to provide a briefing to the Board in the near
future to more thoroughly cover the actions taken by the NNSA and the Pantex
contractor and to answer any questions you may have. I will have my staff work with yours to make the necessary
arrangements.
Sincerely,
Daniel E. Glenn
Manager
cc w/ attachment:
Everet Beckner, NA-10, FORS
Jim McConnell, NA-1,
FORS
Marty Schoenbauer, NA-12, FORS
Mark B. Whitaker, Jr., DNFSB