[DOE LETTERHEAD]
September 5, 2003
The Honorable John T. Conway
Chairman
Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board
625 Indiana Avenue, NW
Suite 700
Washington, D.C. 20004
Dear Mr. Chairman:
This is in response to your letter to me
dated August 7, 2003, regarding the Department’s proposed revision to the DOE Handbook: Electrical Safety (DOE-HDBK-1092-98). We
discussed this proposed revision with members of your staff. While these meetings have been beneficial,
there remains some concerns as to whether the technical content in the proposed
Handbook revision is sufficient to provide clear DOE expectations for
electrical safety, including emphasis in areas of importance.
As you acknowledged in your letter, the
Electrical Safety Handbook is intended to provide guidance to our
contractors. Thus, it can be used as a
reference tool or in support of training programs where appropriate. However, as a DOE guidance document, it
cannot specify program or contractor requirements that must be followed. While the Handbook does reference and adopts
much of the existing Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health (OSH)
requirements, and national electrical codes and standards, such as the National
Electric Code, that are used by our contractors for both DOE and non-DOE work,
the Handbook should not be used as a substitute for federal, national industry,
or local safety codes and standards.
Our contractors are expected to fully know, train and work to these
federal requirements, and national (local) codes and standards. In fact, many of our contractors use these
requirements and standards, rather than the DOE Handbook, as the foundation of
their training programs and basis to meet their contract commitments.
In the Secretary’s letter to you dated
August 5, 2002, we committed to revise the Electrical Safety Handbook. Specifically we indicated that the
“Department is revising the handbook to delete specific references to codes and
standards and make the handbook (a) generic reference guide to appropriate
codes and standards, (b) a guidance document for effective electrical safety
programs, and (c) a document providing guidance for unique DOE work
environments not specifically addressed in national consensus standards.” We also committed to include a new chapter, “Underground
Utilities Detection Equipment During Excavation,” as the Board suggested.
However, I do agree that the importance of
electrical safety cannot be overstated and there are some unique DOE work
environments that may warrant further attention and guidance. To proactively address these unique work
environments, we will proceed in the following manner.
Proceeding in this manner will assure that
we develop additional guidance where needed, maintain fidelity to current codes
and standards, and keep the existing Handbook, DOE-STD-1092-98, available for
the present time as an additional resource and the framework for the DOE
Electrical Safety Group’s activities contemplated in (2) above. We will continue to work with your staff on
this important matter.
If you have any questions, please call me at
202-586-6151 or have your staff contact Richard Black at (301) 903-0104.
Sincerely,
Beverly A. Cook
Assistant Secretary
Environment, Safety and Health
cc:
M. Whitaker, DR-1
E Beckner, NA-10
J. Roberson, EM-l