Behavior-Based Accident Prevention Program (BBAP)
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Cost Benefit Analysis Utilizing the Return on Health and Safety Investments (ROHSI) Process
(Prepared by Jeffrey Chung, Ph.D – LBNL EH&S Division)
Introduction:
Managers
have always desired to identify analytical processes that would
to help them make cost-effective business decisions. This is true
not only in the finance/operations area, but also for safety (EH&S)
investments too.
The
"Return on Health and Safety Investment" (ROHSI)
is a software tool developed by Arthur Anderson, LLP and the Organization
Resources Counselors (ORC), Inc. It provides a methodology to
assist organizations in understanding, measuring, demonstrating
and communicating how health and safety (H&S) investments
impact H&S and business performance. ROHSI facilitates business
decisions through quantitative analysis, financial analysis and
risk management. The process helps provide information to facilitate
decision making by answering:
- What H&S investments should we consider supporting?
- Which H&S investments create the greatest value/return to the organization and how can this value/return are demonstrated?
- To which H&S projects should we allocate our human resources?
- When should we make this H&S investment?
There
was an opportunity to apply this process to evaluate the return
on investment from the Behavior-Based Accident Prevention (BBAP)
program implemented by Facilities Department. A task force was
assembled comprised of Facilities and EH&S personnel to gather
the data needed to apply to the ROHSI process.
Applying
the ROHSI Process to BBAP:
- Several
operational assumptions were established prior to beginning
the ROSHI analysis for the period from 1997 to 1999:
- Facilities
Department Work Profile and Health and Safety Program did
not significantly change with the exception of introducing
BBAP.
- The
Workers Compensation claims processing at LBNL (mechanics
of claims processing) did not significantly change during
this period.
- Internal
efforts to manage Workers Compensation claims took a more
aggressive approach to open/lingering cases.
- State
Workers Compensation Benefits and ratings formulas experience
minimal adjustments during this period (post major WComp overhaul
in the early to mid-1990’s).
- OSHA
Injury and Illness Classification and Recordkeeping requirements
remained constant.
The
cost variables identified and introduced into the ROHSI process
included effort and expenses associated with developing and implementing
BBAP over a two year window:
- EH&S
Division’s personnel time for developing the BBAP program
and investigating SAARs
- BBAP
software development for tracking and trending metrics
- Retaining
a consultant from Behavioral Safety Technology (BST) to
certify LBNL’s BBAP program
- Purchase
of BBAP videos for training coaches
- Creation
of BBAP critical behavior checklists/field booklets
- Sending
LBNL employees to BST Users Conference
- Coaches
Training
- BBAP
Committee Meetings
- Field
Observations by Coaches
- BBAP
Coaches’ meetings
The
total cost/investment into the BBAP program over two years amounted
to $230,000.
Results:
The number of injury and illness incidents that occurred at Facilities
did trend downward from 31 cases (pre-BBAP) to 23 after one year
of BBPA and 22 after two years of BBAP. Costs (legal, WComp, WComp
Third Party Administrator, Medical, etc.) incurred per case also
trended downward, from $33,000/case pre-BBAP to $28,000 per case
during BBAP.
The
payback period to recover the $230,000 BBAP program costs was
7.2 months. The cost-savings generated from BBAP efforts amounted
to $648,000 in reduction of ongoing expenses. The total return
on investment was 281%, nearly a triple gain relative to the amount
of money invested in the BBAP program.
Other
noteworthy observations arising from the Facilities BBAP program
include:
- The
OSHA recordable case rate (TRC) decreased from 13.1 recordable
cases per 200,000 hours worked (pre-BBAP) to 9.4 recordable
cases per 200,000 hours worked (during BBAP) during the
period from February 1997 to February 1999.
- Average
number of days lost per case dramatically decreased in 1998
from 68 days down to 11 days per case.
- Lost
workday case (LWC) rate for Facilities decreased from 10.7
LWCs per 200,000 hours worked to 7.5 LWCs per 200,000 hours
worked.
- Workers
compensation cost per claim within Facilities decreased
from $15,000 per claim to $7,600 per claim (a near-50% reduction).
Conclusions:
Using
the ROHSI process, it has demonstrated that the BBAP program implemented
by Facilities provided positive benefits for the department and
the Laboratory: financial, safety, morale and productivity.
- BBAP has broad application in diverse work environments
- BBAP is an effective accident prevention strategy for proactive management of worker safety by:
- Empowering
employees to influence/improve workplace safety
- Emphasizing
the control of at-risk behaviors, a leading cause (85%) of
all recordable workplace accidents (per National Safety Council)
- Utilizing
positive reinforcement through peers by rewarding right/safe
behavior versus punitive actions. This has spread positive
morale across the Department.
ROHSI
will have application in analyzing future health and safety program
investments for other EH&S initiatives, such as Ergonomics
and Office Behavior Accident Prevention (OBAP). July 19, 1999
This page was last updated on March 25, 2009
|